TaxNewsFlash-Africa

September 15, 2009
No. 2009-09

HOME

CONTACT US     
 

South Africa: VAT Implications of Dealing in Single Stock Futures

In general, it would appear that transactions of single stock futures (SSFs) would be exempt for value added tax (VAT) purposes because a SSF complies with the definition of a derivative. However, the VAT treatment of SSFs is not that certain. A thorough analysis of the manner in which the SSF trading is done is critical to determine the VAT consequences. This, in turn, could affect the entitlement to input tax deductions on expenses incurred relating to the SSF trades.

A SSF trader could, by altering the legal manner in which it transacts, inadvertently change the VAT consequences completely, even though the financial rewards may remain unchanged.

A vendor may, in certain instances, trade in SSFs as principal when it acquires or creates the SSF through SAFEX (the Johannesburg Stock Exchange futures exchange) and issues the SSFs to its client at a margin. The sale of the SSF would constitute a financial service, with the result that the selling price of the SSF would be exempt for VAT purposes. VAT incurred on expenses relating to the trading in SSFs would not be claimable as it relates to the making of exempt supplies.

An interesting question arises when, following commercial considerations, the vendor opts to outsource the trading in SSFs to a third party and only facilitates the transactions between its clients and the third party. The vendor, in this instance, then only benefits by sharing in the profit earned by the third party (who transacts as principal when it sells the SSF). Even though the financial rewards to the vendor could remain the same, a change in the legal manner of transacting could radically impact the VAT consequences.

It could potentially be argued that the profit share received by the vendor on the sale of SSFs is exempt for VAT purposes. Such an argument would be difficult to substantiate when the vendor does not acquire nor sell the SSF as principal, but merely facilitates the transaction and shares the profit earned. The manner in which the transaction is entered into is often evidenced by the accounting treatment—when the vendor only facilitates the deal, the SSFs acquired and sold would often not appear in its books of accounting—the vendor would only recognise the profit share. In this instance the profit earned by the vendor would not be exempt from VAT.

The quid pro quo or purpose for which the profit is earned would need to be determined. Since the vendor merely facilitates the transaction between the principal and its client, the vendor does not provide a financial service to its client. The third party provides the financial service. The profit earned by the vendor would, in all likelihood, constitute a facilitation fee which is a taxable supply. As a result, the vendor would have to account for VAT on the profit share received. While the vendor would be entitled to input tax deductions in respect of expenses relating to the making of taxable supplies, the third-party acquirer of the facilitation service would not be entitled to claim an input tax deduction as the expense relates to the making of exempt supplies.

For more information, contact a tax professional with KPMG in South Africa:

Mabutho Mthembu, + 27 (0) 11 647 8355, mabutho.mthembu@kpmg.co.za

Ferdie Schneider, +27 (0) 11 647 8686, ferdie.schneider@kpmg.co.za

 

ANY TAX ADVICE IN THIS COMMUNICATION IS NOT INTENDED OR WRITTEN BY KPMG TO BE USED, AND CANNOT BE USED, BY A CLIENT OR ANY OTHER PERSON OR ENTITY FOR THE PURPOSE OF (i) AVOIDING PENALTIES THAT MAY BE IMPOSED ON ANY TAXPAYER OR (ii) PROMOTING, MARKETING OR RECOMMENDING TO ANOTHER PARTY ANY MATTERS ADDRESSED HEREIN.

The information contained herein is of a general nature and based on authorities that are subject to change. Applicability of the information to specific situations should be determined through consultation with your tax adviser.

© 2009 KPMG Services (Proprietary) Limited, a South African company and a member firm of the KPMG network of independent member firms affiliated with KPMG International, a Swiss cooperative. All rights reserved.

The KPMG logo and name are trademarks of KPMG International.

KPMG International is a Swiss cooperative that serves as a coordinating entity for a network of independent member firms. KPMG International provides no audit or other client services. Such services are provided solely by member firms in their respective geographic areas. KPMG International and its member firms are legally distinct and separate entities. They are not and nothing contained herein shall be construed to place these entities in the relationship of parents, subsidiaries, agents, partners, or joint venturers. No member firm has any authority (actual, apparent, implied or otherwise) to obligate or bind KPMG International or any member firm in any manner whatsoever.

The information contained in TaxNewsFlash-Africa is of a general nature and is not intended to address the circumstances of any particular individual or entity. Although we endeavor to provide accurate and timely information, there can be no guarantee that such information is accurate as of the date it is received or that it will continue to be accurate in the future. No one should act on such information without appropriate professional advice after a thorough examination of the particular situation.

Direct comments, including requests for subscriptions, to US-KPMGWNT@kpmg.com. For more information, contact KPMG’s Federal Tax Legislative and Regulatory Services Group at + 1 202.533.4366, 2001 M Street NW, Washington, DC 20036-3310.

To unsubscribe from TaxNewsFlash-Africa, reply to US-KPMGWNT@kpmg.com and type ‘TaxNewsFlash Unsubscribe' in the subject line, then click on the SEND button.

 

Privacy | Legal